Core Viewpoint - The Charter Communications class action lawsuit alleges that the company and certain executives made misleading statements regarding the impact of the Federal Communications Commission's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, which affected customer declines and revenue growth [4][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit, titled Sandoval v. Charter Communications, Inc., seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of Charter Communications securities, including call options and put options [1]. - The lead plaintiff process allows any investor who purchased or acquired Charter Communications securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [6]. Group 2: Allegations Against Charter Communications - The lawsuit claims that Charter Communications failed to manage the impact of the ACP ending, which led to a decline in Internet customers and revenue [4]. - It is alleged that the company did not execute broader operations effectively to compensate for the ACP's end, resulting in greater risks to business plans and earnings growth than reported [4]. - The company reported an EBITDA of $5.7 billion for Q2 2025, indicating a 0.5% growth, but also a loss of 117,000 Internet customers, with approximately 50,000 disconnects attributed to the ACP's end [5]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7]. - The firm has been ranked 1 in securing monetary relief for investors in securities class action cases for four out of the last five years [7].
CHTR INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Charter Communications, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit