应进一步提升对IPO企业问询的广度与深度

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity for IPO companies to enhance the breadth and depth of inquiry during the IPO process to present a more transparent image to the market [1][3] - The inquiry process is crucial in the IPO journey, as the initial application documents often fail to reveal the complete picture of a company, necessitating deeper scrutiny by regulatory bodies [1][2] - Historical trends show that many companies withdraw their IPO applications either voluntarily or due to issues uncovered during inquiries, highlighting the evolving nature of the IPO review process [2][3] Group 2 - The IPO review process has evolved from a binary outcome (approval or rejection) to a more nuanced approach that includes conditional approvals, reflecting advancements in market practices [2] - Current inquiries focus on the authenticity of financial data, sustainability of performance, and feasibility of fundraising projects, indicating a shift in regulatory priorities [2] - To achieve greater transparency, inquiries should expand beyond traditional areas to include aspects like debt solutions, inventory risks, and core technology, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of potential issues [3]