Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate, along with the Ministry of Civil Affairs and the China Disabled Persons' Federation, has released typical cases of public interest litigation related to barrier-free and age-friendly inspections, highlighting the achievements made in the enforcement of the Barrier-Free Environment Construction Law since its implementation two years ago [1][2]. Group 1: Achievements in Public Interest Litigation - Since the implementation of the Barrier-Free Environment Construction Law on September 1, 2023, over 6,000 public interest litigation cases have been handled by procuratorial agencies nationwide, focusing on the construction of barrier-free facilities and the protection of the rights of specific groups such as the elderly and disabled [1][2]. - The released typical cases include six significant examples, covering aspects such as barrier-free facility construction, information exchange, and social services, addressing the urgent needs of specific groups in various life scenarios [1][2]. Group 2: Case Studies - Case 1: The Linyi City Procuratorate in Shandong Province urged the standardization of barrier-free facility construction in urban parks, highlighting the lack of compliance with national standards in the construction of the Shuangyue Lake Wetland Park, which severely limited the activity range of specific groups [3][5][6]. - Case 2: The Shaanxi Provincial Procuratorate focused on the accessibility of public service apps, identifying issues that hindered visually impaired individuals and the elderly from accessing information and services, leading to collaborative efforts for necessary modifications [11][13][14]. - Case 3: The Fujian Provincial Procuratorate addressed the lack of accessible emergency call functions for the hearing and speech impaired in the 120 medical emergency system, advocating for the establishment of a comprehensive barrier-free emergency call system [19][21][22]. - Case 4: The Shanghai First Procuratorate emphasized the need for barrier-free facilities at busy port terminals, identifying numerous compliance issues that affected the safety and convenience of elderly and disabled passengers [25][27][28]. - Case 5: The Taizhou City Procuratorate in Jiangsu Province highlighted deficiencies in the design review of barrier-free facilities in public construction projects, advocating for improved oversight to ensure compliance with national standards [32][34][36]. - Case 6: The Shenzhen City Procuratorate focused on the accessibility of medical appointment systems, urging healthcare institutions to implement multi-channel appointment methods to facilitate access for the elderly and disabled [41][43][44].
涉及无障碍和适老化检察公益诉讼 三部门联合发布典型案例
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang·2025-09-17 03:17