AI造谣“有图有真相”，我们该如何对抗？

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-generated rumors has created a black market that poses new challenges for social governance, with significant implications for public safety and trust in information sources [2][4]. Group 1: AI Rumors and Their Impact - AI-generated rumors are increasingly realistic and can mislead both ordinary users and professionals, creating a "chain of evidence" that appears credible [2][4]. - Economic and enterprise-related rumors, as well as public safety rumors, are the most prevalent and fastest-growing categories of AI-generated misinformation [4]. Group 2: Regulatory and Governance Responses - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission launched a special action in July to address the dissemination of false information by self-media, focusing on AI-generated content that deceives the public [5]. - The release of the "Artificial Intelligence Security Governance Framework" 2.0 emphasizes the need for improved regulatory standards and mechanisms to combat AI misinformation [5]. - New media platforms are encouraged to enhance intelligent recognition mechanisms for AI-generated rumors and reform revenue-sharing models to reduce profit incentives for spreading misinformation [5]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The Ministry of Public Security is actively conducting operations to combat online rumors, with legal consequences outlined for those who create and disseminate false information that disrupts social order [5][6]. - Penalties for spreading false information about emergencies can include imprisonment for up to seven years, depending on the severity of the consequences [5]. Group 4: Collaborative Efforts for Mitigation - A multi-faceted approach involving legislation, judicial action, platform responsibility, and public participation is essential to establish a comprehensive governance system against AI-generated rumors [6].