40倍杠杆锁价、场外期货“对赌” 黄金料商却在金价新高时悄悄消失了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emerging risks associated with a high-leverage gold trading model in the Shenzhen Shui Bei market, particularly focusing on the case of Shenzhen Yue Baoxin Precious Metals Co., which has reportedly ceased operations and left many clients unable to retrieve their funds or gold [1][3][7]. Group 1: Trading Model and Risks - The pre-set price trading model allows buyers to lock in gold prices by paying a deposit of approximately 2.4% to 3% of the actual gold price, significantly lower than the typical 10% margin required in standard gold futures trading [1][12][20]. - This model has led to some traders acting as "speculators," engaging in practices such as short-selling, where they do not purchase the gold immediately, hoping to buy it at a lower price later [2][15]. - The high leverage involved in this trading model can lead to substantial financial losses for traders if gold prices rise unexpectedly, as they may be forced to buy at higher prices to fulfill their obligations [16][20]. Group 2: Company Specifics - Shenzhen Yue Baoxin was established in August 2023 and primarily engaged in the sale, wholesale, recycling, and processing of jewelry [5]. - Following the company's abrupt closure, many clients reported being unable to retrieve their gold or funds, with one client citing a loss of over 900,000 yuan worth of gold [6][7]. - The company’s sudden disappearance has raised concerns about a potential wave of similar incidents in the Shui Bei market, although the Shenzhen Jewelry Association has stated that many businesses are still operating normally [7][20]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The trading practices employed by companies like Yue Baoxin may be classified as illegal operations or fraud, as they involve collecting deposits without actual gold reserves or the ability to hedge risks properly [21][22]. - Legal experts suggest that such practices could lead to criminal charges for contract fraud or illegal business operations, as they resemble characteristics of futures trading without proper regulatory oversight [20][21]. - Historical cases have shown that similar trading models have been deemed illegal by courts, leading to penalties for those involved [22].