【环时深度】誓言打击“激进左翼”，白宫瞄准了谁

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political implications following the shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, with President Trump and other officials attributing the incident to the influence of "radical left" organizations, particularly the Antifa movement, which Trump plans to designate as a "major terrorist organization" [1][3][5]. Group 1: Antifa Movement - Antifa is described as a collective of leftist groups opposing right-wing ideologies, characterized as a "radical left disaster" by Trump [3][4]. - The movement lacks a formal structure, leadership, or membership list, and its members range from non-violent leftists to those advocating for violence [3][4]. - Antifa's origins can be traced back to the 1980s, with increased activity noted since 2016, particularly in response to perceived threats from the alt-right [4][5]. Group 2: Political Reactions and Criticism - Trump's administration has consistently blamed Antifa for various societal issues, including the protests following George Floyd's death, despite the lack of a legal framework to designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations [5][6]. - Vice President Pence has called for investigations into organizations funding Antifa, specifically targeting the Ford Foundation and Open Society Foundations, which are accused of supporting leftist media [6][7]. - The Ford Foundation has been criticized by conservatives for allegedly influencing leftist thought and activism in the U.S. [7][8]. Group 3: Broader Political Context - The article highlights concerns that the focus on leftist violence may overshadow the threats posed by right-wing extremism, which has been responsible for a significant majority of extremist-related deaths in the U.S. since 2001 [9][10]. - Experts argue that the motivations behind recent shootings do not fit neatly into the traditional left-right spectrum, suggesting a more complex landscape of political violence [11][12]. - The political climate following Kirk's death reflects a deepening divide, with calls for reducing political tensions largely ignored [12].