Core Viewpoint - A US judge dismissed President Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, citing violations of court rules regarding the clarity and conciseness of claims [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Trump filed the lawsuit in federal court in Tampa against The New York Times Co. and Penguin Random House LLC, alleging that the newspaper acted as a "mouthpiece" for the Democrats [3]. - The lawsuit consisted of an 85-page complaint that the judge deemed excessively detailed and improper, stating it included "repetitive," "superfluous," and "florid" allegations [2][4]. - The judge provided Trump's legal team with 28 days to submit a revised version of the lawsuit, limiting it to 40 pages [5]. Group 2: Judicial Critique - Judge Merryday criticized the lawsuit for including "laudatory" statements about Trump, such as references to his "historic" election win and "singular brilliance," which he found inappropriate for a legal complaint [4]. - The judge emphasized that even if the allegations were true, the initial complaint was not suitable for extensive evidence aggregation or lengthy legal arguments [4].
Trump’s NYT lawsuit tossed for now as ‘inexcusably’ long