What We’re Reading (Week Ending 21 September 2025) : The Good Investors %

Group 1: AI and Technological Innovations - The article discusses the historical context of technological innovations, comparing AI to past innovations like containerization, which initially boosted certain industries but did not lead to long-term wealth creation for many companies [3][4][5]. - It highlights that while AI is seen as the next big thing, the competitive intensity and high capital expenditures may lead to reduced profitability for AI companies, similar to the challenges faced by shipbuilders during the containerization boom [6][10]. - The article suggests that the real beneficiaries of AI productivity gains will be existing knowledge-industry service providers, emphasizing that companies must adapt their strategies to incorporate cost savings effectively [9][11]. Group 2: Investment Opportunities in AI - Investors are advised to focus on companies that can leverage AI to achieve high-quality results from ambiguous information, particularly in sectors like professional services, healthcare, and education, which have not seen significant productivity increases from automation [11][12]. - The article notes that companies with established strategies for cost reduction, like IKEA and Walmart, have historically benefited from technological advancements, indicating a potential investment strategy for AI-related companies [12]. Group 3: Rare Earths and Defense Industry - The U.S. Department of Defense has entered a deal with MP Materials to reduce dependency on China for rare earth elements, specifically neodymium and praseodymium, which are critical for defense applications [30][31]. - MP Materials is set to expand its mining and processing operations and increase magnet manufacturing capacity significantly, with a guaranteed price floor for its products to ensure profitability [30][31][32]. - The deal raises questions about the role of government versus the private sector in addressing supply chain risks and the potential financial implications for U.S. taxpayers if market prices remain low [32][33][34].