Workflow
预制菜争议背后,什么才是食品的“真安全”
Xiao Fei Ri Bao Wang·2025-09-22 02:43

Group 1 - The public debate between Xibei founder Jia Guolong and internet entrepreneur Luo Yonghao highlights the evolving societal understanding of food safety, shifting from mere "harmlessness" to a higher level of "authenticity, transparency, and trust" [1] - The theme of the recently launched 2025 National Food Safety Publicity Week, "Virtue and Law, Shared Food Safety," aligns with the core issues in the food industry, emphasizing the need to redefine and safeguard food safety amid technological innovation and consumer transformation [1] - Consumers' focus on food safety has expanded beyond basic hygiene indicators to include concerns about the authenticity, transparency, and sustainability of food products [1] Group 2 - The prioritization of "virtue" over "law" in this year's publicity week theme suggests a deeper meaning, indicating that while laws set the baseline for safety, ethical self-discipline by companies is essential to address legal gaps and blind spots [2] - The pre-prepared food industry exemplifies the challenges posed by incomplete standards, which allow companies significant leeway in operations, testing their legal awareness and ethical standards [2] - The debate between Xibei and Luo Yonghao fundamentally questions whether food businesses should merely comply with national standards or strive for higher quality food products, prompting industry reflection on responsible consumer engagement [2] Group 3 - The pre-prepared food controversy illustrates the emerging collaborative governance model in food safety, where media exposure raises public awareness, consumer choices exert market pressure, and industry debates help clarify standards, followed by regulatory responses [3] - The expectation is for all food companies to genuinely understand the essence of "Virtue and Law, Shared Food Safety," emphasizing ethical food production, legal compliance, and collaborative safety environment building [3] - Consumers are encouraged to transition from passive recipients of safety to active participants, acquiring food safety knowledge and adopting a rational perspective on food technology developments to better protect their rights and promote sustainable industry growth [3]