一招破两难！广州加快推进“评定分离”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of the "Separation of Evaluation and Decision" system in Guangzhou's bidding process, aimed at enhancing market fairness and accountability in the construction project bidding sector [2][3][19]. Group 1: Reform Measures - Guangzhou has introduced 29 reform measures to improve the bidding process, emphasizing the separation of evaluation and decision-making to address issues of accountability and transparency [2][8]. - The new system separates the roles of evaluation and decision-making, allowing the evaluation committee to recommend candidates while the bidding party makes the final decision based on established criteria [3][4]. Group 2: Accountability and Responsibility - The reform aims to restore the primary responsibility of the bidding party, which has been diluted under the previous system, thereby reducing opportunities for corruption and ensuring that the bidding party is accountable for decisions made [4][7]. - The introduction of the "First Responsible Person System" ensures that the main responsible person in the bidding unit is accountable for the bidding activities, reinforcing the principle of "who invests, who decides, who is responsible, who benefits" [9][10]. Group 3: Evaluation Criteria - The new system encourages a focus on quality and reasonable pricing rather than solely on the lowest bid, promoting a healthier competitive environment in the construction industry [8][12]. - The reform includes the establishment of objective and quantifiable evaluation criteria for decision-making, which helps to minimize subjectivity and potential corruption in the bidding process [11][13]. Group 4: Transparency and Supervision - The "Double Publicity" and "Double Archiving" mechanisms are introduced to enhance transparency, ensuring that the rules and results of the bidding process are publicly accessible [13][14]. - These mechanisms aim to create a fair competitive environment by allowing all bidders to understand the rules and outcomes, thereby increasing trust in the bidding process [15][16]. Group 5: Implementation Strategy - The reform is not a one-size-fits-all approach; it considers the complexity and nature of projects to determine the applicability of the "Separation of Evaluation and Decision" system [16][17]. - The city plans to gradually implement these reforms, ensuring that the process is manageable and effective, while also allowing for expert involvement where necessary [16][17]. Group 6: Future Outlook - The reforms are expected to enhance the quality of construction projects in Guangzhou and serve as a model for other regions in China, promoting a more transparent and fair bidding environment [18][19].