Workflow
When the world’s largest asset manager and the ‘bond king’ both agree — run to gold, silver and bitcoin

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of financial repression, where the government benefits from low interest rates on savings while inflation erodes purchasing power, leading to a loss of real wealth for savers [2][6][7]. Group 1: Financial Repression and Its Implications - Financial repression is described as a strategy used by the government to manage its $37 trillion debt by ensuring that savings earn less than inflation, effectively allowing the government to benefit from the difference [2][6]. - The article highlights that the U.S. money supply has been growing at an annual rate of 7%, which significantly diminishes the real purchasing power of savings [6][18]. - Historical context is provided, noting that during periods of financial repression, such as from 1942 to 1951, bondholders lost substantial purchasing power while real assets preserved value [18][8]. Group 2: Investment Strategies - The article advocates for a shift from traditional savings and bonds to hard assets like gold, silver, and bitcoin as a hedge against financial repression [19][21]. - It suggests a portfolio allocation of 10% in gold and silver and 10% in bitcoin, while advising against long-term bonds [21][22]. - The rising interest in gold and silver is noted, with gold prices increasing over 40% in the current year, indicating a broader market recognition of the need for real assets [16][19]. Group 3: Digital Currency and Stablecoins - The introduction of stablecoins, particularly Tether's new U.S. dollar-backed coin USA₮, is discussed as a mechanism that could further entrench financial repression by mandating users to lend money to the government [14][12]. - The article raises concerns about the implications of stablecoins on traditional financial systems, suggesting that they could force individuals into low-yield Treasury bills [15][14]. - Tether's strategy of accumulating gold while promoting stablecoins is highlighted, indicating a potential divergence between the digital currency market and traditional asset management [15][16].