VoIP-Pal Has Filed and Served Amended Antitrust Complaints Against Apple, Google, and Samsung

Core Viewpoint - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. has filed two amended antitrust lawsuits against major tech companies, alleging unlawful tying of Wi-Fi Calling to cellular bundles, which restricts competition and inflates profits for the defendants [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuits and Allegations - The company now has four active antitrust lawsuits against Apple, Google, Samsung, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, claiming violations of Sherman Act § 2 [1][2]. - The lawsuits assert that the defendants are using a "no bundle, no native" rule to lock out competition and maintain high profits, with the cases pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia [2][4]. Group 2: Market Impact - Over 373 million U.S. mobile subscribers are affected, as they must purchase bundled services to access native Wi-Fi Calling, leading to inflated monthly costs for families [4]. - A family of four may pay approximately $220 per month under the current structure, while a potential stand-alone alternative could cost as low as $20 per month [4]. Group 3: Company Position and Goals - Emil Malak, CEO of VoIP-Pal, emphasizes the need for consumer choice and fairness, stating that families should not have to pay for bundled services unnecessarily [5][6]. - The company has secured over 40 patented technologies in the VoIP field since 2005 and aims to monetize these innovations while advocating for consumer rights [5][7].