宣称俄经济困难是“纸老虎”，鼓动乌克兰夺回“所有土地”，特朗普俄乌立场“重大转变”?

Core Viewpoint - Trump's recent statements indicate a significant shift in his stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Ukraine can reclaim all territories occupied by Russia with the support of Europe and NATO, and urging immediate action from Ukraine [1][3][4]. Group 1: Trump's Statements and Reactions - Trump expressed confidence that Ukraine could "win back all territories" and restore its original borders, describing Russia as a "paper tiger" facing economic difficulties [3][4]. - Ukrainian President Zelensky found Trump's comments surprising and viewed them as a major shift, indicating closer alignment between Ukraine and the U.S. [3][4]. - European officials welcomed Trump's statements, highlighting their strength and the potential for a unified stance against Russia [3][4]. Group 2: Media and Expert Analysis - Western media noted that Trump's reversal is not unprecedented, pointing out his previous pressure on Ukraine to concede territory for a ceasefire [4][6]. - Analysts suggest that Trump's comments may reflect a strategy to leverage the conflict for U.S. economic interests, particularly in arms sales to Europe [6][7]. - There is skepticism regarding the sincerity and effectiveness of Trump's statements, with some questioning what concrete actions he would take to support Ukraine [7][8]. Group 3: Russia's Response - Russian officials, including spokesperson Peskov, rejected Trump's characterization of Russia as a "paper tiger," asserting that Russia is a "real bear" and emphasizing its commitment to its military operations [5][9]. - Peskov acknowledged economic challenges in Russia but attributed them to Western sanctions and global economic conditions, asserting that Russia's economy has adapted to the ongoing conflict [5][9]. Group 4: Implications for NATO and Future Actions - Trump's ambiguous responses regarding NATO's potential military actions against Russia raise questions about his commitment to collective defense [8]. - The ongoing stagnation of peace talks and the potential for increased U.S. involvement in the conflict are highlighted as critical factors influencing the situation [6][8].