专访布鲁金斯学会约翰·桑顿中国中心主任：期待美国新一代政客能推动美国突破困境｜慧眼中国

Group 1 - The core argument suggests that the reduction of U.S. involvement in regional trade negotiations may create space for countries to independently advance regional economic integration [1] - The Trump administration is encouraging key industries to manufacture domestically through tariff policies, aiming to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. [1][2] - The effectiveness of these policies is questioned, as many new factories are automated and create limited direct employment opportunities [1][4] Group 2 - The decline of U.S. manufacturing is attributed to a shift towards a service-oriented economy, with a lack of quality training and new opportunities for those left behind [3] - The perception of free trade in the U.S. has shifted, with many believing it has harmed their interests, leading to a demand for alternative approaches [2] - Current policies may not effectively bring manufacturing capacity back to the U.S., as there is a reluctance among Americans to take on low-skilled jobs [4] Group 3 - The ideal solution to domestic issues is seen as a need for new political leadership that can inspire hope and a vision for the future [5][6] - The current political landscape is criticized for being too focused on immediate challenges, hindering long-term decision-making [6] - The future of China's potential accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) largely depends on China's choices and adherence to clear entry standards [7] Group 4 - The regional integration process in Southeast Asia is viewed as potentially benefiting from reduced U.S. involvement in trade negotiations, allowing countries to pursue their own economic integration [7]