破解大股东减持痼疾 刘纪鹏建言三剂“良方”：设持股上限、流通底价与分红挂钩

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is gradually showing a slow bull trend one year after the "924" policy, but it remains in a value trap due to underlying economic challenges and structural issues in the capital market [1][2]. Group 1: Economic and Market Conditions - The current Chinese economy is in a downward cycle, with significant fiscal pressure on local governments and a severe employment situation, making it difficult for the fundamental economy to provide effective support [1]. - The total social financing in China is heavily reliant on bank loans, which amount to approximately 36 trillion yuan, indicating a low proportion of direct financing from the capital market [1]. Group 2: Liquidity and Institutional Reforms - The coordination efficiency between the central bank and the China Securities Regulatory Commission has significantly improved, with the Central Financial Committee playing a key role in injecting ample liquidity into the market [2]. - Despite a rebound of about 800 points from the market's low, systemic optimization of institutional frameworks is necessary to avoid resistance to further market growth [2]. Group 3: Shareholder Behavior and Corporate Governance - Current large shareholders are focusing on cashing out rather than improving company operations, which undermines the original intent of the capital market to support the real economy [3]. - There are over 5,400 listed companies in A-shares with a total share capital of approximately 77 trillion shares, with more than 90% being tradable, leading to significant pressure for large shareholders to reduce their holdings [2]. Group 4: Proposed Institutional Innovations - Three key institutional innovations are proposed to address structural issues: 1. Setting a cap on the shareholding ratio of the largest shareholder in newly listed companies at 30% to control reduction pressure [4]. 2. Implementing a "minimum price for liquidity" mechanism that ties the reduction price to company performance and market index levels [4]. 3. Linking reduction qualifications to dividend distribution, requiring cumulative dividends to exceed total financing amounts before allowing reductions [4]. - The regulatory authorities are urged to adopt differentiated policies for existing and newly listed companies to prevent a potential market crash due to uncontrolled large shareholder reductions [4][5].