Core Viewpoint - Australia's challenges in closing major M&A deals are increasing, highlighted by the recent failure of ADNOC's $18.7 billion bid for Santos, attributed to valuation disputes, regulatory hurdles, and unexpected issues [1] Group 1: M&A Deal Failures - ADNOC's investment arm XRG cited capital gains tax questions, regulatory uncertainty, and reputational damage from a methane leak as factors affecting their offer for Santos [2] - The methane leak at the Darwin LNG plant, which had been seeping since 2006 at rates up to 184 kilograms an hour, raised concerns about transparency and governance for Santos [3][4] - Other notable failed deals include BHP's $49 billion bid for Anglo American, Brookfield's $10.6 billion offer for Origin Energy, and Albemarle's A$6.6 billion bid for Liontown Resources, all facing similar issues of valuation and regulatory complexities [5] Group 2: Regulatory Environment - Misaligned valuations, regulatory bottlenecks, and shareholder resistance are common challenges in the Australian M&A landscape, with extensive reviews from various regulatory bodies causing delays [6] - The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is perceived to be overreaching, while the corporate regulator ASIC is working on reforms to enhance market appeal [7] - Without clearer regulatory pathways, Australia risks deterring global capital, which is crucial for leveraging the ongoing commodity cycle [8]
Australian Market Struggles With Closing Top Deals - Anglo American (OTC:AAUKF), Albemarle (NYSE:ALB)