10万美元H-1B签证费催生全球人才争夺战，英德韩都在抢先行动

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's immigration policy under the Trump administration is reshaping the global talent flow, potentially accelerating the migration of high-skilled talent to countries like Canada, Europe, and China [1][4]. Group 1: Impact on Talent Migration - The new H-1B visa regulations, which require new applicants to pay fees up to $100,000, are expected to drive high-skilled Indian professionals, who make up over 70% of H-1B holders, to seek opportunities abroad [1][4]. - Germany is actively promoting itself as an attractive destination for Indian talent, highlighting its stable immigration policies and job opportunities in IT, management, and science [1][4]. - The average income of Indian workers in Germany reportedly exceeds that of local Germans, showcasing the potential benefits for skilled migrants [4]. Group 2: Reactions from Other Countries - Countries like Canada and the UK are positioning themselves to attract talent displaced by U.S. immigration policies, with Canada being identified as an ideal destination for those who planned to move to the U.S. [6][7]. - The UK government is considering measures to eliminate visa fees for skilled workers and attract top scientists and digital experts [8]. - South Korea is also exploring opportunities to attract foreign scientists and engineers in response to the U.S. visa changes [8]. Group 3: Industry Responses - U.S. employers, particularly small businesses and startups, may reconsider their international hiring strategies, potentially relying more on local talent or remote outsourcing [2][9]. - The tech industry has expressed strong criticism of the new H-1B regulations, with concerns that the high costs will deter startups from hiring foreign talent [9]. - Major financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan have voiced worries about the increasing barriers to global talent mobility, emphasizing the need for a diverse workforce [9]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The current H-1B visa changes may face legal challenges, as similar measures were previously blocked by courts, indicating potential for ongoing litigation [10][11]. - The procedural hurdles in implementing such policies may delay their execution, raising questions about the authority of the president to set excessive visa fees [11].