【财经分析】隐债化解加速落地：2万亿置换债发行“九成九” 财政可持续性不断增强

Core Viewpoint - The prevention and resolution of local government debt risks is a strategic task crucial to overall development, with significant progress made in the implementation of debt replacement policies since 2025, optimizing the debt structure and enhancing fiscal sustainability for high-quality economic development [1][2]. Group 1: Debt Replacement Progress - As of September 26, 2025, approximately 1.986 trillion yuan of the 2 trillion yuan debt replacement bond quota has been issued, achieving over 99% of the annual target [1][2]. - The issuance of "replacement hidden debt special bonds" has seen a notable extension in maturity, with over 700 billion yuan in 30-year bonds issued, and bonds with maturities over 10 years accounting for over 70% of the total [2][4]. - Regions such as Henan and Hubei have remaining quotas of 76.1849 billion yuan and 62.2886 billion yuan respectively, indicating a targeted approach to debt management [2][3]. Group 2: Policy Implementation and Management - The precise allocation of debt replacement resources is a key feature of the current replacement efforts, with the Ministry of Finance guiding localities in formulating bond issuance plans and managing the entire process [4][5]. - The replacement policies have begun to show effects across multiple dimensions, significantly reducing interest expenses and repayment pressures by replacing high-interest, short-term hidden debts with low-interest local government bonds [4][5]. Group 3: Long-term Mechanism and Fiscal Sustainability - The focus of debt management has shifted from emergency responses to a dual emphasis on regular prevention and the establishment of long-term mechanisms, enhancing fiscal sustainability [6][8]. - The Ministry of Finance has indicated plans to continue implementing a series of debt reduction measures, allowing local governments to access funds earlier to repay hidden debts and stabilize market expectations [6][7]. - A performance management system is being proposed to ensure the efficient use of debt funds, emphasizing the need for a shift from quantity management to quality improvement in debt utilization [7][8].