Workflow
去美国的“打工人”,天塌了
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2025-09-27 11:52

Core Points - The new H-1B visa regulation signed by President Trump has raised the application fee to an unprecedented $100,000, causing panic in the tech industry and prompting companies to reassess their hiring strategies [1][2][18] - The regulation introduces a "weighted lottery" system, favoring higher salaries for applicants, which alters the selection logic for overseas talent [2][18] Impact on Startups - Startups, particularly those with fewer than 25 employees, face severe challenges due to the high visa costs, which could stifle innovation and growth [6][5] - A significant portion of billion-dollar startups have at least one immigrant founder, indicating the critical role of H-1B visa holders in the startup ecosystem [6] Effects on Indian IT Services - Major Indian IT firms, such as Tata, Infosys, and Wipro, are heavily reliant on H-1B visas, and the new fee structure could significantly reduce their core operating profits [7][5] Consequences for Tech Giants - Silicon Valley tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google depend on H-1B visas for hiring software engineers, and the new costs could lead to a shift in hiring focus from emerging talent to experienced professionals, potentially disrupting the talent pipeline [8][5] Challenges for U.S. Universities and Research Institutions - U.S. universities and research institutions, which apply for thousands of H-1B visas annually, may face budget constraints that could limit their ability to hire foreign faculty and researchers, impacting research capabilities [10][11] Broader Economic Implications - The new regulation may accelerate the trend of outsourcing jobs and lead to a significant increase in companies seeking remote talent from abroad, particularly in countries like Canada [12][14][15] - The high visa fees are perceived as a means for the U.S. government to address fiscal challenges while potentially sacrificing global competitiveness [12][18] Legal and Medical Community Reactions - There is growing opposition to the new fee structure, with potential legal challenges being considered in California, and concerns from the medical community about the impact on the recruitment of foreign-trained physicians [17][18]