哥伦比亚抗议美国吊销该国总统签证

Core Viewpoint - The Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed a strong stance against the U.S. revocation of President Petro's visa, stating that the U.S. is using visas as "diplomatic weapons," which contradicts the spirit of relevant UN agreements and international law [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - The announcement highlighted that the U.S., as the host country, has an obligation under the 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement to ensure the smooth entry of foreign delegations to participate in UN meetings [1] - The use of visa denial or revocation as a "diplomatic weapon" obstructs national representatives from participating in UN activities, violating the principles of the UN Charter that guarantee freedom of participation and expression [1] Group 2: Political Context - Colombia's support for the Palestinian people is framed as a "moral and political obligation" in response to potential serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights, and should not be interpreted as illegal behavior [1] - President Petro confirmed on social media that his U.S. visa had been revoked but stated that "this does not matter," emphasizing that the U.S. decision undermines the principles of immunity that the UN and its assembly rely on [1] Group 3: Recent Events - The visa revocation occurred after President Petro participated in a pro-Palestinian demonstration outside the UN headquarters in New York, where the U.S. State Department cited his urging of U.S. soldiers to disobey orders and incite violence as the reason for the visa cancellation [1] - Following the revocation, President Petro returned to Bogotá, Colombia, early on September 27 [1]