Core Viewpoint - President Trump threatens to impose a 100% tariff on all movies produced outside the United States, claiming that international competition is harming the American film industry [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Announcement - The proposed tariff would mark the first instance of tariffs being applied to "services" rather than physical goods [2]. - Trump previously threatened this tariff in May, citing tax incentives from other countries that attract filmmakers away from the U.S. [2]. - California is specifically mentioned as being severely impacted by this potential policy [2]. Group 2: Industry Reaction - The film industry was caught off guard by the initial announcement in May, with industry insiders expressing shock and confusion regarding the feasibility of such a tariff [2]. - Filmmakers often prefer to work close to home, but the lower labor costs and fewer restrictions abroad make overseas production more economical [2]. - Executives from multiple production companies have expressed confusion about how to implement the proposed movie tariff, given the global nature of modern film production [2]. Group 3: Legal and Trade Implications - Legal and trade analysts question the basis for imposing tariffs on films, as they are considered intellectual property and part of global service trade, where the U.S. typically has a surplus [2]. - The increasing prevalence of co-productions with foreign entities complicates the classification of these films and raises further questions about the applicability of tariffs [2]. Group 4: Market Impact - Following the announcement, Netflix's stock price experienced a decline during early trading [3].
刚刚!特朗普:100%关税
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao·2025-09-29 14:37