PAA vs. ET: Which Energy Pipeline Stock Deserves a Spot in Portfolios?

Core Insights - The Zacks Oil and Gas – Production Pipeline industry is crucial for energy logistics, addressing the rising demand for crude oil and natural gas while supporting economic development and energy security [1][2] Industry Overview - Pipeline operators provide a safe, efficient, and cost-effective method for transporting energy resources, ensuring a consistent supply for refineries and consumers [2] - Midstream companies are essential for balancing traditional energy needs with cleaner technology advancements [1] Company Profiles - Plains All American Pipeline focuses on crude oil and NGL transportation and storage, primarily in high-production areas like the Permian Basin, generating cash flow through long-term, fee-based contracts [3] - Energy Transfer operates a diversified portfolio, including crude oil, NGLs, refined products, and natural gas pipelines, with significant assets in the Permian Basin and the Dakota Access Pipeline [4] Financial Performance - Energy Transfer's earnings growth projections for 2025 and 2026 have increased by 7.8% and 11.7% year over year, respectively [6] - Plains All American Pipeline's earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026 have declined by 5.3% and 4.4% year over year [9] Cash Distribution and Returns - Plains All American Pipeline has a cash distribution yield of 8.58%, while Energy Transfer's yield is 7.56% [10][17] - Plains All American Pipeline has a return on equity (ROE) of 11.55%, compared to Energy Transfer's 11.08%, indicating slightly better efficiency [10][12] Debt Levels - Energy Transfer has a debt to capital ratio of 57.16%, higher than the industry average of 55.7%, while Plains All American Pipeline's ratio is 40.13% [14] - The higher debt level of Energy Transfer raises concerns about financial flexibility, although the company is working to reduce leverage [14] Valuation Metrics - Plains All American Pipeline's trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA is 9.74X, below the industry average of 10.66X, suggesting it is undervalued [18] - Energy Transfer's EV/EBITDA is 9.22X, also trading at a discount compared to its industry [20] Conclusion - Both Plains All American Pipeline and Energy Transfer are effectively serving their markets, with Plains being a more favorable investment option due to lower debt levels, stable cash distribution, and better ROE [24]