欧洲头条丨一堵“看不见的墙”为何让欧盟吵成一团？

Core Viewpoint - The EU leaders' summit in Copenhagen on October 1 focused on defense issues, particularly the controversial proposal for a "drone wall" to enhance European defense against threats, especially in light of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict [1][2]. Group 1: Proposal and Discussions - The meeting, originally scheduled for two hours, extended to four hours due to intense discussions, particularly regarding the "drone wall" project, highlighting internal disagreements among EU member states [2]. - The proposal for the "drone wall" aims to create a networked defense system capable of detecting, tracking, and intercepting drones using various technologies [9][12]. - EU defense officials consider the "drone wall" a priority, responding to perceived threats from Russia, as recent drone incidents in Northern and Eastern Europe have raised alarms [5][19]. Group 2: Internal Disagreements - Significant opposition emerged from Germany and France, with leaders expressing concerns that such defense projects should be controlled by member states rather than the EU [13][16]. - The proposal has sparked debate over budget allocation, with Eastern European countries expected to receive a majority of the funding, causing dissatisfaction among Western and Southern European nations [18]. - The complexity of the "drone wall" project has been emphasized, with calls for a more comprehensive defense strategy that includes both short-range and long-range systems [16][18]. Group 3: Political Context and Implications - The backdrop of increasing drone incidents in Europe, including accusations of airspace violations, has intensified the urgency for a defensive response [19][20]. - Observers suggest that the push for the "drone wall" may be more of a political gesture rather than a practical solution to security concerns, reflecting deeper divisions within the EU regarding defense strategies [24]. - The project raises questions about the EU's strategic autonomy and its ability to effectively address security threats, with skepticism about the actual security benefits it may provide [24].