国际观察｜美国联邦政府再次“停摆”与以往有三个不同

Core Points - The current government shutdown in the U.S. is marked by heightened political hostility and a more aggressive approach from the Trump administration against the Democratic Party, differing significantly from previous shutdowns [1][2][5] - The Democratic Party is displaying unusual unity and determination to fight for healthcare cost reductions, contrasting with their previous fragmented responses [4][5] - The ongoing political polarization is leading to severe economic and social impacts, with approximately 750,000 federal employees affected and public services disrupted [5][7] Group 1: Trump's Aggressive Tactics - Trump is leveraging the shutdown to eliminate programs favored by Democrats, including terminating 223 energy projects across 16 states, totaling approximately $7.56 billion [2] - The administration plans to implement a federal workforce reduction, targeting employees perceived as Democratic supporters [2][5] - Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich describes Trump's strategy as unprecedented, aiming to dismantle the Democratic agenda through a calculated political offensive [2][3] Group 2: Democratic Unity and Strategy - The Democratic Party is presenting a rare moment of solidarity, with members committed to resisting Trump's actions during the shutdown [4] - Analysts suggest that this shutdown is a critical test for the Democratic Party to regain support and prepare for the upcoming midterm elections [4][5] - The party's previous failures to stand firm against Republican pressures have led to a significant drop in their approval ratings, prompting a more aggressive stance this time [4] Group 3: Escalating Political Hostility - The current political climate is characterized by increased animosity between the two parties, with the shutdown expected to have prolonged economic and political ramifications [5][6] - The shutdown has already resulted in significant disruptions, including unpaid leave for federal employees and halted public services, exacerbating uncertainty in the economic outlook [5][7] - The political conflict has overshadowed critical discussions on issues like gun control, as both parties focus on attacking each other rather than addressing pressing national concerns [5][6]