Group 1 - The construction of a unified national market requires continuous efforts in improving institutional rules, unblocking factor markets, and eliminating local protectionism and market segmentation to provide a stable, efficient, and predictable development environment for various business entities [1][2] - The shift in government investment attraction and enterprise investment strategies reflects a need for new approaches, moving away from traditional methods like low land prices and tax reductions [1][2] - The promotion of fair competition is essential for market vitality, as past practices of creating "policy lowlands" and local protectionism have hindered fair competition [1][2] Group 2 - The introduction of the "Fair Competition Review Regulations" at the national level aims to eliminate practices that obstruct a unified market and ensure equal participation for all business entities [2] - Local innovations, such as integrated service reforms and streamlined documentation processes, are enhancing the business environment and shifting the focus from competing on policies to providing high-quality services [2] - The establishment of a fair competition review mechanism in Jiangxi has demonstrated that removing local protection can enhance market competitiveness and lead to increased revenue for businesses [3] Group 3 - A well-regulated, fair, and open unified national market serves as fertile ground for societal creativity and vitality, improving resource allocation efficiency and unlocking market potential [3] - Identifying roles and comparative advantages within the unified national market is crucial for enhancing government services and contributing to high-quality economic development [3]
公平无偏差 市场添效能(评论员观察)——“差距”之中育新机③
Huan Qiu Wang·2025-10-09 05:40