进口再生纸浆新规出台，对造纸行业意味着什么｜专家解读

Core Viewpoint - The announcement by the General Administration of Customs marks the end of the era of dry pulp imports, aiming to regulate the import of recycled pulp and enhance supervision to prevent the entry of "foreign garbage" into China [1][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The new regulation requires importers to specify the production method of recycled pulp as either "dry" or "wet" on customs declarations, increasing the scrutiny of imported materials [1][4]. - The regulation is a response to the environmental hazards posed by dry pulp, which is essentially shredded solid waste, and aims to prevent the import of hazardous materials [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Impact - The new rules will increase the workload for importers, who must ensure accurate reporting of production processes and verify the sources of their materials, potentially leading to higher operational costs [4][8]. - Companies relying on low-cost dry pulp may face pressure to adjust their production processes or seek alternative raw materials, leading to short-term supply chain disruptions [8]. - Long-term, the regulation is expected to drive the industry towards greener practices, encouraging a shift from low-quality dry pulp to higher-quality recycled or virgin pulp, thereby improving overall product quality [8]. Group 3: Environmental Concerns - Dry pulp production lacks adequate purification processes, allowing contaminants like plastics and heavy metals to enter the production cycle, posing significant health and environmental risks [2][3]. - The previous lack of stringent checks on imported recycled pulp has led to the entry of solid waste under the guise of recycled materials, necessitating the new regulatory measures [3][4]. Group 4: Historical Context - The initial national standard for recycled pulp allowed for dry pulp to address fiber shortages in the paper industry, reflecting a balance between industry needs and environmental concerns at the time [5]. - The understanding of the risks associated with dry pulp was limited when the standards were set, leading to a regulatory framework that was more permissive than protective [5].