Workflow
麻省理工学院拒绝特朗普政府“签协议换拨款”提议
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang·2025-10-10 23:28

Core Points - The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) publicly rejected a proposal from the Trump administration that required universities to sign agreements with specific terms in exchange for priority access to federal funding [1] - MIT's president, Sally Kornbluth, stated that the proposed agreement included values and principles that the institution does not agree with, such as limiting freedom of speech and institutional independence [1] - The agreement's premise fundamentally contradicts MIT's core beliefs, emphasizing that scientific funding should be based solely on research value [1] Summary by Sections MIT's Rejection of the Proposal - MIT is the first university to reject the Trump administration's "sign agreement for funding" proposal [1] - The proposal was sent to nine universities, including the University of Arizona, Brown University, Dartmouth College, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Southern California [1] Specific Terms of the Proposal - The agreement included specific terms such as limiting the enrollment of international undergraduate students, freezing tuition for five years, prohibiting consideration of race and gender in hiring and admissions, and banning any actions that "disparage" conservative views [1] Responses from Other Universities - The Trump administration requested these universities to respond by October 20 [1] - The mayor and city council of Tucson, where the University of Arizona is located, opposed the university signing the agreement, while the leadership of the University of Virginia found certain terms of the agreement "extremely unacceptable" [1] Broader Context of Government Actions - Since Trump's return to the White House in January, the U.S. government has threatened to investigate dozens of universities on charges of "anti-Semitism" and has threatened to cut or reduce federal funding [2] - Some universities, like Columbia University, have reached settlement agreements with the Trump administration, while others, such as Harvard University, have chosen to continue legal battles [2]