Workflow
深圳知名地标半价易主背后:谁的“阳谋”?

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen's landmark, the Royal Court Plaza, has changed ownership due to a judicial ruling that allowed the creditor, Guangyao Xianglan, to acquire the property through debt compensation for 3.053 billion yuan, following the failure of a previous auction [2][6]. Group 1: Ownership Change - Royal Court International announced that its subsidiary, Rongfa Investment, lost ownership of the Royal Court Plaza as a result of a judicial ruling to compensate Guangyao Xianglan's debts [2]. - The Royal Court Plaza was previously valued at approximately 5.75 billion yuan as of December 31, 2024, making it a significant asset for the company [2][18]. - The loss of the Royal Court Plaza may trigger financial warning signs for Royal Court International, potentially leading to forced delisting risks [2][18]. Group 2: Debt Background - The ownership change stems from a loan agreement made in March 2016, where Rongfa Investment used the Royal Court Plaza as collateral for a 3 billion yuan trust loan from CITIC Trust [3]. - By March 2021, the loan had matured with an outstanding balance of 2.75 billion yuan, but due to policy changes, it could not be renewed, leading to a lawsuit from CITIC Trust [3]. Group 3: Debt Restructuring Attempts - Royal Court International began planning for debt restructuring and significant asset sales in February 2022, including the sale of at least 51% of Rongfa Investment [4]. - The company engaged with multiple potential buyers, ultimately choosing Fenghan Yigang Property Management as a partner, but the restructuring process faced delays due to disagreements on specific details [4][5]. - Despite the lack of progress, Royal Court International continued to issue updates on the restructuring efforts, indicating ongoing communication with Fenghan Yigang [5]. Group 4: Judicial Execution and New Creditor - The creditor changed from CITIC Trust to Guangyao Xianglan, which led to the judicial execution for debt compensation [7]. - Guangyao Xianglan, a small enterprise established in June 2021, acquired the debt from CITIC Trust shortly after its formation [7][8]. - The judicial auction of the Royal Court Plaza initially failed, but Guangyao Xianglan later successfully obtained ownership through the debt compensation ruling [7][8]. Group 5: Connections Between Parties - Investigations revealed that Fenghan Yigang and Guangyao Xianglan may have connections through shared control by the same holding entity, raising questions about the competitive nature of their relationship [8][9][12]. - The timeline suggests that Guangyao Xianglan was established to acquire the debt after the loan default, while Fenghan Yigang was involved in the restructuring discussions [12][19]. Group 6: Financial Implications - The Royal Court Plaza's annual revenue was approximately 369 million yuan in 2024, accounting for 56.03% of Royal Court International's total revenue [17]. - Despite the acquisition, the debt situation remains unresolved, with total liabilities exceeding 4.2 billion yuan, indicating a significant financial gap post-compensation [18].