司法部发布规范涉企行政执法专项行动第二批典型案例

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Justice has released the second batch of typical cases aimed at standardizing administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, focusing on addressing issues of "disorderly inspections" and "arbitrary fines" [1][2]. Group 1: Strengthening Supervision and Legal Compliance - The government has intensified supervision to ensure that only qualified entities conduct administrative inspections, thereby preventing unauthorized inspections [1][2]. - Specific cases highlight the rectification of unauthorized inspections by third parties and the establishment of clear responsibilities for auxiliary personnel in law enforcement [5][10]. Group 2: Reducing Excessive Inspections - Efforts are being made to reduce the frequency of inspections and to streamline the inspection process, transitioning from a "dispersed and arbitrary" approach to a "coordinated and efficient" model [2][11]. - A notable case showed a 33% reduction in inspection frequency in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, while the problem discovery rate increased by 29.6% [11]. Group 3: Ensuring Fair and Just Law Enforcement - The government is addressing illegal practices such as setting arbitrary fines and ensuring that penalties are proportionate to the violations [2][17]. - Cases demonstrate the correction of unlawful penalty practices and the establishment of accountability mechanisms to prevent future violations [17][18]. Group 4: Improving Fact Recognition and Penalty Precision - Administrative law enforcement agencies are focusing on clear and reasonable fact recognition to avoid repeated penalties and ensure that penalties are proportionate to the violations [3][21]. - A case in Shandong showed that a company was wrongfully penalized despite having complied with payment obligations, leading to a correction of the enforcement decision [21][23]. Group 5: Promoting Information Sharing and Coordination - The establishment of information-sharing mechanisms among different departments is being emphasized to prevent issues like duplicate penalties [3][25]. - A case in Jilin demonstrated the successful collaboration between forestry and natural resource departments to rectify overlapping penalties, enhancing overall administrative efficiency [25].