一财社论：为企业松绑减负，遏制乱检查乱罚款必须落到实处

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Justice has emphasized stricter scrutiny of the eligibility of entities involved in administrative penalties, highlighting the importance of proper administrative enforcement and the need to correct illegal practices in administrative law enforcement [1][3][6]. Group 1: Administrative Penalty Practices - The recent release of eight typical cases showcases the results of a campaign against excessive inspections and fines, focusing on ensuring that penalties are precise and reasonable [1][2]. - A notable case involved a fire rescue team in Henan Province that set mandatory monthly targets for administrative penalties, which undermines the seriousness and authority of administrative enforcement [1][5]. - The Ministry of Justice has indicated that the scrutiny of the eligibility of entities imposing penalties will become increasingly stringent, as improper delegation of responsibilities has been a common issue [3][6]. Group 2: Importance of Corrective Measures - The principle of proportionality in administrative penalties is crucial, with recent cases illustrating failures in accurately identifying violations and applying the law [4]. - Corrective actions often arise from public reports and internal supervision, indicating the need for stronger institutional frameworks and increased penalties for violations [4][6]. - The Ministry of Justice is accelerating the development of administrative enforcement supervision regulations to enhance the legal framework supporting high-quality enterprise development and public safety [4][6]. Group 3: Accountability and Governance - The administrative enforcement supervision agency has mandated the cancellation of penalty targets in the aforementioned case, aiming to rectify the enforcement approach that prioritizes fines [5][6]. - There is an expectation for accountability measures against responsible parties in cases of misconduct, as these actions significantly impact government credibility [5][6]. - The ongoing campaign against illegal administrative practices is expected to reveal more violations, creating a "high-pressure environment" for enforcement entities [6].