河南一地消防队下达“月度指标”：罚款金额不少于2000元，行政处罚不少于2件！还设置“群接龙打卡+月末通报”考核要求！司法部通报

Group 1 - The core focus of the recent administrative law enforcement action is to address issues of "random inspections" and "random fines," enhancing the precision and effectiveness of administrative checks, thereby alleviating burdens on enterprises [2][3] - The release includes eight typical cases that showcase the practical outcomes of addressing "random inspections" and "random fines," highlighting the importance of administrative law enforcement supervision in correcting enforcement irregularities and promoting a citizen-centric enforcement philosophy [2][3] - A specific case from a county in Henan revealed that the local fire rescue team imposed mandatory monthly targets for administrative penalties, which led to a pattern of uniformity in penalty cases, prompting the administrative law enforcement supervision bureau to intervene and correct this enforcement approach [2][3] Group 2 - The administrative law enforcement supervision bureau discovered that the fire rescue team had set rigid targets for penalties, which contradicted the original intent of administrative law enforcement and undermined its authority and credibility [3] - The Ministry of Justice emphasized the need for continuous improvement in the demonstration and warning effects of typical cases, urging local authorities to increase accountability for illegal enforcement actions and to translate the results of the special actions into tangible benefits for enterprises and the public [3]