拒绝调岗仍在原岗位上班打卡，店长因旷工被开除

Core Viewpoint - The company's decision to transfer the employee to another store is deemed reasonable and within the bounds of the labor contract, as the basic salary remains unchanged and the job position is consistent [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions - The company exercised its management rights by transferring the employee to another store, which was agreed upon in the labor contract regarding potential changes in work location [2]. - The employee's claim that the transfer resulted in a decrease in salary lacks factual basis, as the basic salary remained unchanged [2]. Group 2: Legal Considerations - The court ruled that the company's actions did not violate any legal provisions and that the employee's refusal to comply with the transfer could be classified as absenteeism, justifying the termination of the labor contract without compensation [2]. - The judge emphasized the importance of clearly defining work location, job responsibilities, and salary in the labor contract to prevent misunderstandings [1][2]. Group 3: Employee Responsibilities - Employees are advised to adhere to company policies and report to new positions when reasonable transfers occur within the contractual framework [2]. - In cases of illegal transfers or disputes regarding transfers, employees should communicate rationally and retain evidence to protect their rights through legal channels, rather than engaging in direct confrontation [2].