Core Points - The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs has invoked the Goods Availability Act to intervene in the operations of Nexperia, a Chinese-owned semiconductor company, prohibiting asset transfers and executive dismissals without government approval for one year [1] - The Amsterdam Court of Appeal has ruled to remove the Chinese CEO of Nexperia, appointing a foreign executive temporarily [1] - The Dutch government claims there are "serious management deficiencies" at Nexperia, aiming to prevent supply disruptions and protect economic security in the Netherlands and Europe [1] Group 1 - Nexperia is a major manufacturer of diodes and transistors, primarily supplying the European automotive and consumer electronics industries [1] - The intervention coincided with recent U.S. sanctions against Chinese companies, with Nexperia's parent company listed on the U.S. Entity List [1] - The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs stated that the timing of their decision was coincidental and not influenced by the U.S. [1] Group 2 - Court documents reveal that the Dutch Foreign Ministry had discussions with the U.S. State Department, indicating that the U.S. viewed the Chinese CEO's position as problematic [2] - The U.S. aims to force a withdrawal of Chinese investment from Nexperia, with the Dutch government under pressure to comply with U.S. demands [2] - The term "50% rule" was mentioned nearly 20 times in court documents, highlighting the urgency of the Dutch government's response to U.S. sanctions [2] Group 3 - The intervention by the Dutch government is seen as an infringement on the legitimate interests of Chinese enterprises and could damage its international reputation and business environment [3] - The incident is viewed as a warning for future investments, indicating that geopolitical shifts can lead to unexpected government interventions [3] - There is a call for the Dutch government to correct its excessive interference with Chinese companies and to resist unreasonable demands from the U.S. [3]
正听丨对中资企业“下手”?荷兰政府找错了“肇事方”
Ke Ji Ri Bao·2025-10-15 06:30