年利率440%、60多个马甲......助贷新规之后,月系融担产品浮出水面
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-10-16 02:23

Core Insights - The implementation of new lending regulations has led to the emergence of "monthly system financing guarantee" products, which are characterized by short borrowing periods and high annualized interest rates, often exceeding legal limits [1][16] - Users of these products are primarily those engaged in multiple borrowing, often to repay previous debts, indicating a cycle of high-risk borrowing behavior [1][20] - The market is witnessing a shift as demand for high-interest loans persists despite regulatory restrictions, leading to the rise of alternative lending models [1][18] Group 1: Product Characteristics - Monthly system financing guarantee products typically have borrowing periods of one month or less, with annualized interest rates reaching as high as 440% when including guarantee fees [4][1] - These products are often marketed under various aliases to evade regulatory scrutiny, with over 60 different names reported in the market [15][6] - The operational structure of these products is complex, often involving multiple parties such as small loan companies and financing guarantee firms, which can obscure the true cost of borrowing [19][8] Group 2: Regulatory Impact - The new lending regulations, effective from October 1, 2025, impose a cap on annualized interest rates at 24%, significantly affecting the pricing of existing loan products [16][17] - As a result of these regulations, many users have been pushed out of traditional lending channels, creating a vacuum that new high-interest products are filling [18][17] - The regulations aim to protect consumers by ensuring transparency in the total cost of loans, but the demand for credit remains, leading to the emergence of potentially riskier lending practices [16][20] Group 3: Consumer Risks - There is a growing concern about the rise of illegal lending practices, such as "black online loans," which involve coercive lending and aggressive collection tactics [21][24] - Users have reported experiences of forced lending and high-pressure tactics, indicating a troubling trend in the lending landscape [21][23] - The phenomenon of "rent-to-own" loans is also emerging, where consumers face exorbitant costs disguised as rental agreements, leading to significant debt burdens [26][28]