Core Points - Trump may attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court regarding tariffs, marking a historic moment as he would be the first sitting president to do so [1] - The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on November 5 concerning Trump's request to overturn lower court rulings that found he lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs [1][3] - The Trump administration argues that the IEEPA grants the president the authority to regulate imports in response to "any unusual and extraordinary threat" [3] Group 1 - The Supreme Court's upcoming hearing is considered one of the most significant cases in U.S. history, with potential long-term implications for national security and economic stability [1] - Lower courts have ruled that Trump's tariffs may not be legally justified under the IEEPA, with the appellate court affirming that tariff powers belong to Congress [1][3] - Trump's chief lawyer, John Sauer, contends that the courts lack the capacity to determine when diplomatic matters require urgent responses, suggesting that such decisions should rest with the president and Congress [4] Group 2 - Despite the ongoing legal challenges, Trump continues to announce new tariffs, including a 100% tariff on imported brand-name drugs and a 50% tariff on cabinets and related products [4] - The administration's actions regarding tariffs have been described as unusually swift, with the announcement of tariffs on copper occurring just 144 days after initiating an investigation, well within the typical timeframes [4][5] - Legal experts suggest that the Trump administration is shifting towards a dual-track tariff strategy, indicating that tariffs will remain a significant aspect of regulatory and enforcement actions in the foreseeable future [5]
又要创造历史?特朗普下月或亲赴现场,“督战”最高法院关税案辩论
Di Yi Cai Jing·2025-10-16 06:13