J&J(US:JNJ) RTE.ie·2025-10-16 06:26Core Viewpoint - Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is facing its first lawsuits in Britain regarding allegations that its talc products cause cancer, amidst ongoing litigation in the US involving tens of thousands of similar claims [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuits and Allegations - The lawsuit in the UK was filed on behalf of over 3,000 individuals who claim their ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other diseases were caused by J&J's baby powder used between 1965 and 2023 [2]. - KP Law alleges that J&J's talc products contained carcinogenic fibers, including asbestos, which is linked to mesothelioma [2]. - J&J has consistently asserted that its talc products are safe and do not contain asbestos [3]. Group 2: Corporate Responsibility and Legal Strategy - J&J has referred inquiries to Kenvue, which has taken on the responsibility for talc-related litigation outside the US and Canada [3]. - Kenvue maintains that J&J baby powder does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer [3]. - J&J ceased selling talc-based baby powder in the US in 2020 and in the UK in 2023, switching to a cornstarch product [4]. Group 3: Financial Implications and Court Decisions - J&J has attempted to resolve litigation through bankruptcy, a strategy that has been rejected by federal courts three times [4]. - Recently, J&J was ordered to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma, marking one of the largest awards against the company [4]. - The estimated value of the UK lawsuit is around £1 billion [5]. Group 4: Legal Process in England - Lawsuits in England are typically determined by a judge rather than a jury, which is a significant difference from the US legal system [6]. - Kenvue expressed confidence that a judge will conclude that its talc-based baby powder does not cause cancer [6].