Huan Qiu Shi Bao·2025-10-17 03:11Core Viewpoint - The statement by the Israeli Prime Minister highlights Israel's technological achievements but also reflects global anxieties regarding the weaponization of communication devices and digital technology, primarily driven by the systemic practices of the United States and other Western countries [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Digital Hegemony - The establishment of U.S. digital hegemony is rooted in its dominance over the global information and communication technology (ICT) ecosystem, including monopolies on hardware and standards [1]. - The U.S. government has been revealed to use legal tools to compel domestic tech companies to create backdoors in communication devices, transforming them into potential intelligence-gathering points [1][2]. - The U.S. controls software ecosystems and data collection, leveraging its market dominance to gather vast amounts of data, which feeds into a global surveillance network [2]. Group 2: Impact on Global Relations - The U.S. employs a narrative strategy to deflect attention from its own surveillance practices, labeling other nations as digital threats while suppressing competitors like Huawei and ZTE without solid evidence [2][3]. - The U.S. has utilized its position in global financial and technological standards to impose restrictions on foreign competitors, thereby maintaining its technological edge [3]. - The enactment of laws like the Cloud Act allows the U.S. to demand data from companies worldwide, undermining other nations' sovereignty [3][4]. Group 3: Consequences of Digital Weaponization - The "Snowden Paradox" has led to a global trust crisis, as revelations about U.S. surveillance practices have caused other nations to reassess their data sovereignty and cybersecurity [4]. - The rise of "sovereign internet" and data localization trends reflects a global response to U.S. actions, leading to fragmentation of the digital space and hindering global innovation [4]. - The U.S. faces a dilemma of interdependence, as attempts to decouple from China may backfire, impacting its own technological ecosystem and innovation capabilities [4][5]. Group 4: Role of Chinese Tech Companies - Chinese tech companies are positioned as both victims of U.S. hegemony and as challengers to the existing monopolistic order through their pursuit of self-reliance and innovation [5]. - Initiatives like the Global Data Security Initiative and Global AI Governance Initiative from China propose an alternative to the hegemonic model, advocating for cooperation and mutual benefit [5]. - The call for a multilateral, democratic, and transparent global digital governance system emphasizes the need to return technology to its original purpose of serving human development [5].