佣金还是抽成，这是一个问题｜蔚言大义

Core Viewpoint - The transition from "commission" to "cut" reflects a shift in the perception of intermediary services in the digital economy, where platforms have become essential facilitators of transactions, leading to a change in how fees are viewed and understood [4][5][9]. Group 1: Role of Intermediaries - Intermediaries provide essential services such as information matching, verification of transaction details, and process facilitation, which justify the fees paid by both parties involved in a transaction [3][4]. - The existence of intermediaries helps reduce transaction costs and improve efficiency, making the payment of fees reasonable in the context of real estate transactions [3][4]. Group 2: Evolution of Fees - In the digital age, intermediaries have evolved into platforms that connect supply and demand, leading to a more complex fee structure that often obscures the specific services provided [4][7]. - The term "cut" has emerged as a more colloquial and negative connotation compared to "commission," reflecting a perception of exploitation and lack of transparency in platform fees [6][9]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - Recent regulatory documents have begun to recognize and differentiate between "commission" and "cut," indicating a formal acknowledgment of the changing landscape of platform fees [8][9]. - The inclusion of "cut" in regulatory guidelines suggests a shift in how platform fees are categorized and understood within the broader economic framework [8][9]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - The decline in growth rates in relevant sectors has heightened sensitivity to fees, making the transition from "commission" to "cut" more pronounced as stakeholders become more aware of their expenditures [10]. - Platforms face market constraints that can limit their ability to impose high fees, as excessive cuts may drive merchants to seek alternatives, thereby impacting platform revenues [9][10].