Qi Lu Wan Bao·2025-10-21 00:58Core Points - The article discusses a case involving a car accident where the insured party, Zhang, faces significant challenges in receiving fair compensation from the insurance companies involved [6][8][12] Group 1: Accident Details - Zhang's vehicle, a Mercedes-Benz EQS450+, was severely damaged in a rear-end collision on the highway, resulting in extensive repairs estimated at 530,000 yuan [4][6] - The accident was determined to be the fault of the other driver, as confirmed by the traffic police's accident report [5] Group 2: Insurance Claim Issues - Zhang purchased the vehicle for approximately 670,000 yuan and insured it for 520,000 yuan, but the responsible party's insurance company, China Life Insurance, only offered a compensation of around 240,000 yuan based on the market value of a second-hand vehicle [6][10] - The discrepancy between the insured amount and the offered compensation has raised questions about the fairness of the insurance valuation process [8][10] Group 3: Industry Insights - Insurance professionals indicate that the valuation of vehicles for insurance purposes often relies on a system that may not accurately reflect the true value of unique vehicles, such as test drive cars [10][12] - The case highlights a broader issue within the auto insurance industry regarding the potential gap between the insured value at the time of policy issuance and the actual market value at the time of a claim [9][10] Group 4: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts assert that while the insurance company's actions may be legally justified, they may not be perceived as fair, emphasizing the need for transparent and accurate vehicle valuation methods [11][12] - Zhang is advised to seek a third-party assessment of her vehicle's value to challenge the insurance company's valuation and potentially negotiate a better settlement [13]