美方已丧失谈判主动权

Core Viewpoint - The recent export control measures on rare earths by China have raised concerns among U.S. politicians, who claim these actions will significantly impact various industries globally, including semiconductors and artificial intelligence, while China asserts that these measures are not targeted at specific countries and are aimed at preventing illegal use of rare earths [1][3][4]. Group 1: China's Position - China has communicated its policy objectives regarding the new export controls to relevant countries, including the U.S., to reduce misunderstandings [3]. - The export control measures are designed to prevent rare earths from being used for large-scale weapons and are not a ban on exports [3][4]. - China maintains that it has the right to decide how to sell its rare earths, given that it produces over 90% of high-performance rare earth magnets globally [3][4]. Group 2: U.S. Response and Criticism - U.S. officials have accused China of "long-arm jurisdiction," but this perspective is seen as a misinterpretation of China's legitimate trade regulations [4][5]. - The U.S. has been expanding its own security boundaries, implementing export restrictions on semiconductors and AI, which raises questions about the consistency and rationale behind its actions [5][6]. - The U.S. has faced criticism for its approach to trade negotiations, which is perceived as coercive rather than collaborative [8]. Group 3: Future Implications - The tension surrounding these export controls highlights a shift in trade negotiation dynamics, suggesting that the U.S. may not hold the upper hand in future discussions [6]. - Both China and the U.S. have agreed to engage in new rounds of economic talks, indicating a potential for dialogue despite existing tensions [7].