当学术自由遭遇政治交易：美国七所顶尖大学为何对白宫说“不”

Core Points - The Trump administration's proposal for a "Higher Education Academic Excellence Pact" has faced significant rejection from top universities, with seven out of nine invited institutions declining to participate [1][4][5] - The agreement aims to exchange federal funding for greater control over university policies, including admissions and faculty hiring [2][3] Group 1: Proposal Details - The pact offers priority access to federal research funding for universities that align with the Trump administration's policies, while granting the government increased control over various academic areas [2][3] - Key conditions of the agreement include eliminating gender and racial factors in admissions, assessing faculty diversity, and implementing a five-year tuition freeze [3] Group 2: University Responses - MIT was the first to publicly reject the proposal, stating that it contradicts their core belief that research funding should be based solely on academic merit [4] - Following MIT, other universities such as Brown, Penn, and USC also issued statements declining the proposal [4][5] - Arizona University became the seventh institution to refuse the pact, emphasizing the importance of academic freedom and independent research funding [4] Group 3: Government's Misjudgment - The Trump administration previously exerted pressure on universities by freezing federal research grants, leading some institutions to reach temporary agreements [5] - The recent collective rejection of the new proposal indicates a miscalculation by the White House regarding its influence over academic institutions [5][6] Group 4: State-Level Reactions - California's Governor Newsom warned that any state university signing the pact would face immediate funding cuts, labeling the agreement as radical [6]