加沙停火陷困局：协议自身存缺陷 美国斡旋难奏效

Group 1: Fragility of the Ceasefire Agreement - The ceasefire agreement is characterized by vague content, lacking clear provisions for subsequent negotiations, leading to potential conflicts during execution [3] - The agreement primarily focuses on the temporary release of hostages and does not address critical issues such as the disarmament of Hamas [3] - Both Israel and Hamas have insufficient recognition of the ceasefire agreement, as neither party personally signed it in Egypt, and both maintain conflicting objectives regarding control over Gaza [3] Group 2: Return of Palestinians to Their Homes - Despite the ceasefire, the Israeli military still controls approximately 53% of Gaza, preventing many Palestinians from returning home [4] - There have been incidents of the Israeli military killing Palestinians who allegedly crossed the designated "yellow line" [4] - Humanitarian aid entering Gaza remains significantly below the actual needs, and Israel has indefinitely postponed the opening of the Rafah crossing, crucial for humanitarian assistance, citing Hamas's failure to return all bodies [4][6] Group 3: Challenges of U.S. Mediation - The U.S. faces significant challenges in its mediation efforts, with the second phase of ceasefire negotiations yet to commence and no concrete roadmap in sight [9] - Israel's strong inclination to eliminate Hamas complicates the situation, as there is a strong impulse to resume military action [9] - The effectiveness of U.S. pressure on Israel is questionable due to its historical bias and protection of Israel [9]