局长职位引发激烈争夺！NASA重启登月竞标，马斯克连发数帖大骂

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between NASA and SpaceX, particularly following NASA's announcement to restart the crewed lunar landing program bidding, which has led to public criticism from SpaceX founder Elon Musk towards NASA's acting administrator, Sean Duffy. The backdrop includes a competitive race against China for lunar exploration, with political infighting complicating NASA's objectives and potentially delaying the lunar program further [1][2][3]. Group 1: NASA and SpaceX Dynamics - NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy announced that SpaceX's Starship development is significantly behind schedule, which could hinder NASA's goal of returning to the Moon before China [3]. - Musk publicly criticized Duffy, questioning his intelligence and capability to manage NASA's space program, highlighting the tensions between the two parties [2][3]. - NASA has allocated over $40 billion for the development of crewed lunar spacecraft and rockets, indicating a heavy reliance on private companies for its lunar missions [9]. Group 2: Political Infighting - The competition for the NASA administrator position has intensified, with Duffy seeking to secure his role while billionaire Isaacman, previously nominated by Trump, is also vying for the position [6][7]. - Duffy's announcement to restart the lunar program bidding appears to be a strategic move to align with Trump's interests, as the former president desires a return to the Moon before his term ends [5][6]. - The political landscape surrounding NASA is described as chaotic, with concerns that internal conflicts could further delay the lunar program [1][8]. Group 3: Industry Competition - The renewed bidding for the lunar program has attracted various players, including SpaceX, Blue Origin (founded by Jeff Bezos), and established defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, all vying for a share of the lucrative contracts [8]. - The competition is characterized by significant financial stakes, with estimates for a retro lunar lander potentially reaching $20 billion to $30 billion [8]. - The article suggests that the increasing power of billionaires and their companies in the space sector could lead to both exciting and potentially dangerous outcomes for the industry [9].