Core Insights - The article emphasizes the shift in urban development from "incremental expansion" to "stock optimization" as urbanization rates exceed 65% in China, driven by changes in marriage and family structures [1] - The 2025 Central Urban Work Conference aims to establish "livable, resilient, and smart" modern cities, indicating a transition from localized renovations to systematic governance [1] - Urban renewal requires a shift from a "project-oriented" technical approach to a "systemic thinking" that balances various relationships for high-quality development [1] Group 1: Urban Development Paradigm Shift - The tension between stock and increment represents a paradigm shift in urban spatial resource allocation, moving from "external expansion" to "internal regeneration" due to land resource constraints and ecological limits [2] - Urban renewal is characterized as a governance experiment that must balance the pace of development, advocating for a "slow planning - fast implementation" dual mechanism [2] - The boundaries of "fast" and "slow" should be defined by "risk levels" and "value types," with specific approaches for safety-oriented and memory-oriented updates [2] Group 2: Cultural and Economic Value in Urban Renewal - Urban renewal is framed as "translating memory" rather than erasing it, where historical cultural resources are viewed as "spatial capital" that gains economic value through "meaning reconstruction" [3] - The process of urban renewal should follow a three-step model of "gene extraction - scene reconstruction - business embedding" to achieve a paradigm shift from "protection" to "activation" [3] - The "14th Five-Year Plan" prioritizes public welfare, with central government funding directed towards upgrading old neighborhoods and public spaces, aiming to convert "spatial premiums" into "public welfare" [3] Group 3: Balancing Economic and Social Benefits - Economic benefits are seen as a prerequisite for sustainability, while social benefits are the foundation for harmonious coexistence, achieved through a value recovery mechanism [4] - The relationship between protection and development is fundamentally about preserving and enhancing urban spatial capital, with a focus on "dynamic management" rather than "static protection" [4] - A digital governance platform is proposed to establish a dynamic balance between protection and development, avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach [4] Group 4: Governance Structure Innovation - The relationship between government and market reflects an innovation in governance structure, with the government transitioning to a "system designer" role and the market evolving into an "operator" role [5] - The essence of urban renewal is a systemic reconstruction of "space - system - society," forming a complete loop of resource allocation, cultural value translation, and equitable distribution of benefits [6] - The ultimate goal is to build a "beneficial city" that emphasizes institutional resilience and social collaboration, moving beyond project thinking to integrated systems [6]
协调好六重关系 高质量推进城市更新
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-10-24 01:59