低价买下法拍房后发现有两万余元物业欠款，谁来付？法院判了

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal complexities surrounding the responsibility for unpaid property management fees when purchasing judicial auction properties, emphasizing the need for buyers to be aware of potential liabilities associated with such transactions [1][4]. Group 1: Case Summary - In June 2022, a buyer named Wang acquired a property through judicial auction, only to discover that the previous owner, Zhou, owed over 21,000 yuan in property management fees [2]. - The property management company demanded payment from both Zhou and Wang, citing a clause in the auction announcement that stated the buyer would be responsible for any outstanding fees during the transfer process [2][3]. - The court ruled that Zhou was responsible for fees incurred before the property transfer, while Wang was liable for fees incurred after the transfer, leading to a judgment that required Zhou to pay 13,076.57 yuan in property service fees and Wang to pay 1,538.42 yuan for the period following the transfer [3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The case underscores the principle of contractual obligations, where the original owner remains liable for debts incurred prior to the transfer of ownership, despite the auction process [3]. - The court's decision reflects a balance between the rights of the new owner and the obligations of the previous owner, reinforcing the notion that auction buyers should conduct thorough due diligence before participating in such transactions [4]. - The increasing popularity of judicial auction properties comes with inherent risks, including potential unpaid fees and existing liabilities, which buyers must consider carefully [4].