日本5500亿美元对美投资会“打水漂”吗

Core Viewpoint - The $550 billion investment from Japan to the U.S. is perceived as potentially wasted, leading to a depreciation of the yen, pressure on Japan's finances, and increased burdens on the populace [1][9]. Investment Agreement Details - Investment Timeline: Japan will invest $550 billion in the U.S. from October 2023 to January 19, 2029 [1]. - Investment Sectors: The focus will be on key industries such as semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals, energy, and artificial intelligence [1]. - Management Structure: An investment committee led by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce will oversee the investments, with the U.S. President having final decision-making authority [2]. - Japanese Role: Japan will only participate in a consultative capacity, providing advice and legal review without actual decision-making power [3]. - Profit Distribution: Initially, profits will be split equally, but after Japan recoups its investment, the U.S. will receive 90% of the profits while Japan will only get 10% [5]. - Constraints and Countermeasures: Japan must deposit funds into a designated account within 45 days of project approval, with the option to refuse funding for specific projects, although this could lead to increased tariffs on Japanese goods [5]. Economic Implications - Currency Impact: The large investment in U.S. dollars may pressure the yen to depreciate further, potentially leading to rising import prices and inflation [5][6]. - Historical Context: The 1985 Plaza Accord, which led to a significant appreciation of the yen, serves as a cautionary tale for Japan, highlighting the importance of maintaining a stable currency [5]. - Current Economic Challenges: Japan's economy is not as export-driven as in the past, making a weak yen less beneficial and potentially harmful due to rising import costs [5][6]. - Fiscal Pressure: The interest on the funds required for the investment could exceed the returns from Japan's holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds, increasing fiscal strain [8][9]. Political Reactions - Domestic Response: Japanese public opinion views the investment agreement as an "unequal treaty," with concerns about future government burdens [4][9]. - Leadership Stance: Newly elected Prime Minister Kishi Suga has indicated a willingness to renegotiate if the agreement does not align with Japan's interests [11].