半固态电池或将更名固液电池

Core Viewpoint - The battery industry is moving towards a clearer understanding with the proposed renaming of "semi-solid batteries" to "solid-liquid batteries," addressing confusion in market perception and promoting standardized development [2] Industry Insights - The term "semi-solid battery" has inherent ambiguity, allowing for a wide range of liquid electrolyte content (1%-99%) to be classified under this label, leading to market confusion [2] - Some companies have exploited this ambiguity by marketing products with 5%-10% liquid electrolyte as "solid-state batteries," misleading consumers and obscuring the true technological maturity and safety of these products [2] - The new name "solid-liquid battery" accurately reflects the coexistence of solid and liquid electrolytes, distinguishing it from "all-solid-state batteries" and clarifying its transitional technology position [2] Market Implications - The unified naming convention serves as a "transparent benchmark" for the industry, enabling consumers to better understand product characteristics and preventing companies from using naming strategies to obscure technological differences [2] - This change is expected to refocus competition on core metrics such as solid electrolyte content and safety performance, rather than marketing gimmicks [2] - The renaming is seen as a calibration to eliminate market excesses, guiding industry resources towards practical advancements in solid-liquid hybrid systems and cost control [2] Technological Development - The shift from "semi-solid" to "solid-liquid" represents a respect for technological essence and a commitment to consumer rights, marking a significant step towards maturity and rationality in China's power battery industry [2] - This renaming not only improves naming standards but also establishes a crucial bridge for technological innovation and market order [2]