如愿以偿的高市早苗如何偿还政治赌债

Core Points - The election of Sanna Takashi as Japan's first female Prime Minister is marked by political compromises with the Japan Innovation Party, raising concerns about her stability in office [1] - The collaboration between the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the Japan Innovation Party is fraught with policy disagreements, particularly regarding the "sub-capital" concept aimed at decentralizing power [2] - The proposed reduction of 10% in the number of Diet members primarily targets proportional representation, which could disadvantage other political parties and provoke internal dissent within the LDP [3][4] - The agreement to ban corporate and organizational political donations poses a significant challenge for the LDP, especially after the departure of Komeito from the ruling coalition [4] Group 1 - Sanna Takashi's ascension to the Prime Minister's position is seen as a "political gamble" that may require repayment of compromises made with the Japan Innovation Party [1] - The Japan Innovation Party's demand for the "sub-capital" plan could lead to significant financial implications for the government, with estimates suggesting a need for at least 7.5 trillion yen (approximately 352 billion RMB) if central administrative functions are relocated [2] - The political landscape is complicated by the fact that the Japan Innovation Party's members predominantly come from small electoral districts, while other parties rely heavily on proportional representation, leading to potential conflicts [4] Group 2 - The joint governance agreement between the LDP and the Japan Innovation Party only expresses a desire to pass the proposal for reducing Diet members, indicating a lack of commitment [5] - The Japan Innovation Party's strategy of distancing itself from the LDP while maintaining a cooperative agreement suggests a lack of trust, allowing for a potential exit if conflicts arise [5] - Overall, the partnership between the LDP and the Japan Innovation Party appears to be a temporary arrangement, with both parties pursuing their political interests at the expense of long-term stability [5]