拿糖当钱找零？开店怎能既不大方又不严谨

Core Points - The incident involving Zhao Yiming's snack store using candy as change has sparked significant public discussion, highlighting a deviation from standard business practices [2][3] - The company's official response clarified that while they do not support this practice, some stores may ask customers for consent to use candy as change if they lack sufficient coins [2][4] - The practice of using candy instead of cash violates consumer rights, including the right to informed consent and choice, and can be seen as a form of forced transaction [4][5] Summary by Sections Company Practices - Zhao Yiming's snack store has been criticized for using candy as change, which is not officially supported by the company [2] - The practice is perceived as an attempt to avoid losing small amounts of cash, which contradicts typical business strategies that focus on customer attraction and retention [3] Consumer Rights - According to consumer protection laws, customers have the right to fair trading conditions, including accurate pricing and the ability to refuse unwanted products [2][3] - The use of candy as change without explicit consent from customers infringes on their rights and can be classified as a deceptive practice [4] Market Implications - The incident raises concerns about the respect for market transaction rules and consumer rights, suggesting that such practices could lead to broader issues of consumer trust and business integrity [3][4] - The accumulation of such practices could result in significant financial gains for the business at the expense of consumer rights, highlighting the need for stricter adherence to ethical business conduct [4][5]