Workflow
北交所新股战略配售收益“爆表” 制度优化封堵“伪战投、真套利”
Zheng Quan Shi Bao·2025-10-27 22:18

Core Insights - The popularity of new stock subscriptions on the Beijing Stock Exchange (BSE) has surged since 2025, with a common subscription rate below 0.05%, making it increasingly difficult to obtain shares [1][2] - Strategic placements by institutions have allowed them to secure 20%-30% of new shares in advance, resulting in significant paper profits, with an average increase of 3.58 times for new stocks listed on the BSE since 2025 [1][2] Subscription Trends - The competition for strategic placements has intensified, becoming a battleground for various institutions [2] - The total frozen funds for new stock subscriptions have risen sharply, with 10 new stocks freezing over 600 billion yuan, and some exceeding 700 billion yuan [2] - The average cumulative increase for new stocks listed this year on the BSE is 3.58 times, with some stocks like Xingtong Measurement and Control increasing by as much as 12.82 times [2][3] Institutional Participation - Institutions participating in strategic placements have achieved remarkable returns, with an overall floating return rate of 137% for 22 institutions that had their placements unlocked in 2025 [3][8] - The BSE has seen a shift in participant structure, with major brokerages and private equity funds leading the way, alongside industry-backed investors [6][8] Regulatory Changes - In April 2025, the BSE revised its rules to increase the number of strategic investors and the proportion of shares allocated, aiming to attract more quality investors and enhance market liquidity [4][8] - The latest requirements for participating in strategic placements emphasize the need for investors to have a good market reputation, strong financial capability, and a long-term investment perspective [8][9] Market Dynamics - The strategic placement market has faced scrutiny, with concerns about "pseudo-strategic investments" and institutions without industry backgrounds securing significant shares [6][9] - Experts suggest that the focus should shift from "personal connections" and "average allocations" to "service-oriented" and "competitive allocations" to ensure that strategic placements genuinely support long-term corporate development [9]